SYMPOSIUM EDITORS
Sarah Harding, Steven J. Heyman, Gregory C. Pingree, and Mark D. Rosen

INTRODUCTION: LAW AND CULTURAL CONFLICT
Sarah Harding

LAW AND CULTURAL CONFLICT
Robert Post

SIX OPINIONS BY MR. JUSTICE STEVENS: A NEW METHODOLOGY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CASES?
Robert F. Nagel

IDEOLOGICAL CONFLICT AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Steven J. Heyman

FREE SPEECH AND CONFLICTS OF RIGHTS: COMMENTARY ON ROBERT F. NAGEL, “A NEW METHODOLOGY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CASES?” AND STEVEN J. HEYMAN, “IDEOLOGICAL CONFLICT AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT”
Susan J. Brison

BARNETTE’S BIG BLUNDER
Steven D. Smith

ESTABLISHMENT, EXPRESSIVISM, AND FEDERALISM
Mark D. Rosen

LIBERALISM AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
Steven H. Shiffrin

NO EXPRESSLY RELIGIOUS ORTHODOXY: A RESPONSE TO STEVEN D. SMITH
Andrew Koppelman

A WAR OF WORDS: REVELATION AND STORYTELLING IN THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST MORMON POLYGAMY
Sarah Barringer Gordon

LEGAL FEELING: THE PLACE OF INTIMACY IN INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE LAW
Nancy Bentley

LAW, CULTURE, AND FAMILY: THE TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF CULTURE AND THE LIMITS OF LAW
Nancy E. Dowd

AFTERWORD: TOWARD STABLE PRINCIPLES AND USEFUL HEGEMONIES
Gregory C. Pingree

STUDENT NOTES

THE QUALITY OF MERCY IS STRAINED: HOW THE PROCEDURES OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT LITIGATION AGAINST LAW FIRMS FRUSTRATE BOTH THE SUBSTANTIVE LAW OF TITLE VII AND THE INTEGRATION OF AN ETHIC OF CARE INTO THE LEGAL PROFESSION
Jay Marhoefer

WHY ILLINOIS SHOULD ABANDON FRYE’S GENERAL ACCEPTANCE STANDARD FOR THE ADMISSION OF NOVEL SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
Andrew R. Stolfi